Question about Identical vs. Fraternal

Discussion in 'Pregnancy Help' started by Ericka B, Mar 28, 2007.

  1. Ericka B

    Ericka B Well-Known Member

    I am just wondering for those of you who have been on this site for a while reading birth stories. Does it seem like mono-chorionic twins are born earlier than Di-chorionic twins? Just curious, because obviously it is more likely that there would be placenta issues with monochorionic. It just seems like my ob is really thinking that I will deliver somewhere between 34-36 weeks, but it seems like a lot of ladies are able to go longer. Mine are mono/di, and yes I am very uncomfortable but want to keep them in as long as it is good for them.
     
  2. BDFDGirl (Heather)

    BDFDGirl (Heather) Well-Known Member

    This is a great question.... I want to know the answer as well. My twins are mono di.
     
  3. stbmo4

    stbmo4 Well-Known Member

    I don't know if they are "naturally" born earlier, or if docs just prefer to deliver them earlier because of complications with placenta, slowed growth, etc.
     
  4. Trish_e

    Trish_e Well-Known Member

    I don't know statistics but I have mono di twins and I delivered at 39 weeks. I think it depends on your doctor and what they feel comfortable with. I wish you all the best and hope you go as long as possible.
     
  5. Kaylee Marie

    Kaylee Marie Well-Known Member

    A woman I know had mono-mono (same placenta, same sac) twins. Her doc scheduled a c-section for 32 weeks b/c he was worried the babies would hurt each other. He said that was standard for mono-mono.

    I have dichrionotic identical twins and carried to 38 weeks before being induced. don't know any standards for mono-di twins.
     
  6. Susanna+3

    Susanna+3 Well-Known Member

    It's kind of ironic...but my sister and I were probably mono-mono twins... my mom tells me we were in the same sac and shared the same placenta...but they didn't know that she was having twins... I believe we came around 2 weeks early, and we were both healthy and over six pounds each. So you never know. i would think that they would monitor things more carefully...that even if the growth looks good they might want to keep an eye on how the cord looks b/c of it wrapping around one of the babies...just more likely that the cord might get compressed I would think...
     
  7. Brook

    Brook Active Member

    There is a wide variety of opinions in regards to this issue. I am quite jaded since my mo/di pregnancy was complicated by TTTS and I know of women who have lost their babies at 34 weeks due to acute TTTS. If I were to ever carry mo/di babies again, I would insist on 2 ultrasounds every week from week 16 on, NST's 3x/week from week 26 on and hospitalization at 32 weeks for continuous monitoring. I know my doctor would do that because of the complications I had with my last 2 pregnancies.

    If I were you, I would at least be pushing for NST's 2-3 times per week with an ultrasound weekly. If there is any indication that either baby is starting to develop a problem, I would take them IMMEDIATELY. It is far different having a monochorionic pregnancy and there is definitely a time when it safer to have them out then have them in. My sons were born at 29 weeks -- had they left them in I am POSITIVE they would not be here today. Some women can safely go to term, some can't. It all depends on the placenta.
     
  8. stephsboys

    stephsboys Well-Known Member

    My dd's twins were mono/di and born at 36w 1d via scheduled c-section.
     
  9. MusicalAli

    MusicalAli Well-Known Member

    My mono-di boys were born at 37 weeks. I was induced due to pre-e (which would have happened regardless of what kind of twins I was carrying). They were not ready to be born yet. They were quite comfortable and it was a hard inducement. Anyway, neither my OB nor I were going to take the babies early unless there was some medical indication (which there was in the case of my health, not the babies). Should I carry another set of IDs, the only thing I would do different would be to request u/s more often (they were every other week at the end).
     
  10. debid

    debid Well-Known Member

    I'm sure that if you look at a large sample, you would find more issues and earlier average deliveries with mono/di than with di/di. Sure, there are exceptions to everything but the fact is that there is a greater risk when the placenta is shared.

    FWIW, my OB thought I'd deliver around 34-37 weeks simply because that is when most twin pregnancies deliver. It had nothing to do with my individual circumstances. We induced at 39 (di/di) with no complications at all other than my rising blood pressure.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Yet another identical/fraternal question The First Year Dec 11, 2009
Yet another identical or not question! The First Year Nov 18, 2009
Expecting Identical Twins - Question for other ID Twins Parents The First Year Oct 22, 2009
For those with 'Identical Twins'......question regarding appearance The First Year Jul 5, 2009
Question about Identicals Pregnancy Help Mar 17, 2009

Share This Page