I need help identical or ferternal

Discussion in 'The First Year' started by sagertwins, Mar 9, 2007.

  1. sagertwins

    sagertwins Well-Known Member

    I have a question my girls are now 4 months old and we went to the dr yesterday and there is still and 50/50 on if they are identical or not as for they shared the same sake but they each had there own placenta's they both have the same birthmark and eye color and hair color and have to be next to each other all the time but to me they look nothing alike but everyone tells us all the time that they look alike. Im confused I think they are not identical.
     
  2. Her Royal Jennyness

    Her Royal Jennyness Well-Known Member

    I believe that if they shared the same sac they are identical.

    Do you have a picture to share? I'm sure we could tell you! [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  3. JDMummy

    JDMummy Well-Known Member

    I think all moms can see the subtle differenced even between ID twins. If they were in the same sac, it is likely they are ID. Along with the eye color, same birthmarks, and hair I would say its possible. Do you know their blood type? If they are different they are fraternal. You can order a DNA swab test. Several members here have done it and it was accurate.
     
  4. twinduckmom

    twinduckmom Well-Known Member

    I believe it is impossible for fraternal twins to share the same sac! There is your answer right there! [​IMG]
     
  5. Raneysmama

    Raneysmama Well-Known Member

    I think it would also be impossible to share a sac, yet have different placentas?? If they shared a chorionic sac, they would only have one placenta as far as I know. If their blood types are the same, maybe you could have DNA testing done?
     
  6. debid

    debid Well-Known Member

    quote:
    I think it would also be impossible to share a sac, yet have different placentas??


    Actually, that's not the case according to a book I have. It shows four different possibilities for monozygotic twins and one is separate placentas in a shared chorion. A shared amnion, however, would allow only one placenta.
     
  7. Her Royal Jennyness

    Her Royal Jennyness Well-Known Member

    quote:
    Originally posted by debid:
    quote:
    I think it would also be impossible to share a sac, yet have different placentas??


    Actually, that's not the case according to a book I have. It shows four different possibilities for monozygotic twins and one is separate placentas in a shared chorion. A shared amnion, however, would allow only one placenta.

    So she had di/mono twins, interesting! Fraternals always have 2 sacs, because they are from 2 separate eggs. I do think you have your answer!
     
  8. kelc2006

    kelc2006 Member

    Same sack? Wouldnt that make them monoamniotic and there for be very high risk? My twins were thought to have shared the same sack until about 18 weeks. At that time they found a very thin membrane. Makbe there was athin membrane between the two that they didnt see.
     
  9. TTTSMiracleMom

    TTTSMiracleMom Well-Known Member

    I am 99.999999% positive it is impossible to have two placentas and one chorion. Which book did you read that in? I am really curious on this one -- if that book is right, it dispels everything I've ever been taught as an RN.
     
  10. 2boysforus

    2boysforus Well-Known Member

    I was told by the peri. that our boys were fraternal because they had their own sacks.
     
  11. Melina

    Melina Well-Known Member

    QUOTE(2boysforus @ May 2 2007, 09:33 PM) [snapback]241666[/snapback]
    I was told by the peri. that our boys were fraternal because they had their own sacks.

    Identicals can have different sacs as well. It's a common misconception that 2 sacs means fraternal. I think it's like 33% of those with 2 sacs are still ID.
     
  12. Merijo

    Merijo Well-Known Member

    I think we need clarification as to WHAT sac they shared. The chorionic or the amniotic?

    If they shared a chorionic sac then they would have only one placenta. This is what mine were (mono chorionic-diamniotic) and they are identical according to eveything I've read.

    Merijo
     
  13. angie7

    angie7 Well-Known Member

    QUOTE(2boysforus @ May 2 2007, 09:33 PM) [snapback]241666[/snapback]
    I was told by the peri. that our boys were fraternal because they had their own sacks.


    I was also told that my girls were frats b/c they had seperate sacs/placentas. Turns out through DNA testing that they are ID so having seperate sacs/placentas does not guarantee frats.
     
  14. twinlove4life

    twinlove4life Well-Known Member

    I have wondered about our girls too. I think we are going to just have the test done. My girls had seperate sacs and a fused placenta so the midwife told us they were fraternal. After talking to their pedi though it is pretty rare that they would have the same blood type (O+) when dh and I are completely different types (A+ and O-) so it was a 1/4 chance. And then you factor in that they had a twin to twin transfusion syndrome from the fused placenta and they are both female. He says for all of those things to be present and still have them be frat would mean I should play the lottery. Then again, I was told that even though every generation in my family had twins (Grandpa is a fraternal, Dad is an identical tested and true and I have identical brothers tested and true) the gentic counselor gave us a 5% chance. Maybe I should play the lotto. :p
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Need Help Finding Healthy French Bulldog Puppies for Sale General May 25, 2025
Need Help with HVAC Installation General Sep 23, 2024
Need legal help General Apr 14, 2023
Need help General Oct 22, 2020
Need help with stress General Nov 11, 2019

Share This Page